On September 11th, three buildings collapsed in the heart of New York City, most people only recognise that two buildings collapsed, why is it that many people don't recall the fall of Building 7 ? Is it this way because the US Government metaphorically speaking want to push the issue of Building 7 under the rug?
At 5:20 pm Building Seven, apart of the World Trade Centre complex officially collapses due to the fallen debris from the North and South tower and hours of burning. Once again the fall of Building 7 raises questions just like the fall of the Twin Towers. The reason why questions are asked is because the steel framed, 47 floored building just collapsed because of small fires and falling debris. It is impossible for a building like Building 7 to collapse they way it supposedly did without explosives. The collapse of Building 7 had many characteristics of a controlled demolition, this can be seen in the video below.
At 5:20 pm Building Seven, apart of the World Trade Centre complex officially collapses due to the fallen debris from the North and South tower and hours of burning. Once again the fall of Building 7 raises questions just like the fall of the Twin Towers. The reason why questions are asked is because the steel framed, 47 floored building just collapsed because of small fires and falling debris. It is impossible for a building like Building 7 to collapse they way it supposedly did without explosives. The collapse of Building 7 had many characteristics of a controlled demolition, this can be seen in the video below.
Larry Silverstein acquired a 99 year lease of the WTC complex in the spring of 2001. Throughout the summer Silverstein reworked the insurance polices to make sure that the WTC complex was covered from any terrorist attacks. Months after the collapse of the buildings Silverstein went to court with the insurance company that was covering the complex, he was raising the point that due to the two planes crashing into it validated him to get more money. In the end Silverstien acquired $ 7 billion, which was a major increase from the original policy which covered up to $15 million.
Below is a controversial video surrounding the fall of the WTC, Larry Silverstien explains how he made the decision to 'pull it' (Referring to Building 7 ).
Below is a controversial video surrounding the fall of the WTC, Larry Silverstien explains how he made the decision to 'pull it' (Referring to Building 7 ).
The statement made in the video makes people further believe that Building 7 and even the Twin Towers were taken down with controlled demolition. In Silverstein's defense he claims that the meaning of 'Pull It' was referring to get the firemen out of the building, but there is no record of any firemen being inside the building around the time of when Silverstien stated 'Pull It'. Therefore it further leads towards the idea of 9/11 being an inside job.