“The building was designed to have a fully loaded 707 crash into it. That was the largest plane at the time. I believe that the building probably could sustain multiple impacts of jetliners because this structure is like the mosquito netting on your screen door -- this intense grid -- and the jet plane is just a pencil puncturing that screen netting. It really does nothing to the screen netting.”
Frank A. Demartini, on-site construction manager for the World Trade Center spoke of the resilience of the towers in an interview recorded on January 25, 2001.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/design.html
The quote above raises many questions about how, on September 11th 2001 the Twin Towers collapsed. According to The National Institute of Standards and Technology the official cause to the collapse of the Twin Towers was due to the simultaneous effect of the impact of the planes and the fires.
The official cause then raises more questions as their has never been a steel frame building that has collapsed due to fire before and after 9/11. The is reinforced by 2005 building fire in Madrid, the 106m skyscraper caught ablaze due to a electrical fault and was on fire for 20 consecutive hours around 19 more than the Twin Towers, but in the end the structural frame of the building stayed in tact unlike the Twin Towers.
Another question that has to be asked when discussing the fall of the Twin Towers is that if the building fell due to the heat fire, then how did employee's from the floors above the impact zone (supposedly the hottest point of the building) manage to navigate there way down through the impact zone and escape the building without major burns. If the fire was hot enough to weaken the steel structure of the building then it would be near impossible for a person to enter the area without dying or receiving major burns.
For the US Government to verify how the buildings collapsed and how the heat affected the steel they hired a company called Underwriters Laboratories(UL) to perform certain test's that would help the Government raise a final conclusion on the fall of the buildings. UL is a safety consulting and certification company who provides safety-related certification, validation, testing and inspection on certain structures, objects, ETC. UL performed a series of test's to verify how the buildings collapsed, due to the heat softening the steel and came back with the results that the floor models did not collapse and the steel structure didn't soften. The Governments response to this was updating their report explaining that the floors did not collapse and that they did tests on the few samples they obtained from the fire zones which indicated that the temperatures were remarkably low and weren't hot enough to soften steel. In the final summary in the official report the Government claimed that the WTC floors did collapse and the steel did soften, this final statement contradicted all of the results from the tests UL carried out and what the Government wrote months before the final statement.
Frank A. Demartini, on-site construction manager for the World Trade Center spoke of the resilience of the towers in an interview recorded on January 25, 2001.
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/design.html
The quote above raises many questions about how, on September 11th 2001 the Twin Towers collapsed. According to The National Institute of Standards and Technology the official cause to the collapse of the Twin Towers was due to the simultaneous effect of the impact of the planes and the fires.
The official cause then raises more questions as their has never been a steel frame building that has collapsed due to fire before and after 9/11. The is reinforced by 2005 building fire in Madrid, the 106m skyscraper caught ablaze due to a electrical fault and was on fire for 20 consecutive hours around 19 more than the Twin Towers, but in the end the structural frame of the building stayed in tact unlike the Twin Towers.
Another question that has to be asked when discussing the fall of the Twin Towers is that if the building fell due to the heat fire, then how did employee's from the floors above the impact zone (supposedly the hottest point of the building) manage to navigate there way down through the impact zone and escape the building without major burns. If the fire was hot enough to weaken the steel structure of the building then it would be near impossible for a person to enter the area without dying or receiving major burns.
For the US Government to verify how the buildings collapsed and how the heat affected the steel they hired a company called Underwriters Laboratories(UL) to perform certain test's that would help the Government raise a final conclusion on the fall of the buildings. UL is a safety consulting and certification company who provides safety-related certification, validation, testing and inspection on certain structures, objects, ETC. UL performed a series of test's to verify how the buildings collapsed, due to the heat softening the steel and came back with the results that the floor models did not collapse and the steel structure didn't soften. The Governments response to this was updating their report explaining that the floors did not collapse and that they did tests on the few samples they obtained from the fire zones which indicated that the temperatures were remarkably low and weren't hot enough to soften steel. In the final summary in the official report the Government claimed that the WTC floors did collapse and the steel did soften, this final statement contradicted all of the results from the tests UL carried out and what the Government wrote months before the final statement.
Below are two video's that are comparing the fall of the South Tower and a controlled demolition
Both of the video's have similarities as the buildings both fell as if there was nothing below them, which is very strange for the collapse of the South Tower as the plane hit building and damaged floors 75-85. This still left a undamaged massive structure under the impact zone that should of slowed the collapse of the building substantially. But the building just fell at a rapid speed, scientific work was done by Metallurgy Expert Paolo Marini regarding the speed of the collapse of the South Tower, results showed that if a object was to free fall from the height of 400m (around the height of the South Tower) it would take 9 seconds, the time it took the South Tower to collapse was around 10 seconds. This is very unusual because of how quickly the tower fell, the non-damged structure should of increased the collapse time majorly or even withstand the collapsing upper floors. This then leads to the idea of, Were the buildings taken down by controlled demolition?
This Video below supports the idea of, how the towers were taken down due to controlled demolition, as these New York Firemen give their first hand experiences on the collapse of the buildings.
Another fact which came from the 9/11 events which needs to be questioned, was from all of the three buildings that collapsed on September the 11th in New York city there were traces of molten steel. This is very unusual because to obtain molten steel there has to be temperatures around 1600 Degrees Celsius, in all of the three buildings the approximate maximum temperature was 800 Degrees Celsius. Then people ask 'How did it get there ?', well substantial quantities of sulphur were found in the wreckage, which once again is very strange because it has no place to be in the wreckage of the three towers. Many scientists conducted tests to conclude why there was sulphur in the buildings rubble and they came to a conclusion that there were traces of sulphur because their had been a use of the explosive substance thermite. The reason the scientists believed that thermite had been used is not only because their were large traces of sulphur, but it explains why there would be pools of molten metal and fell so rapidly and similar to a controlled demolition.
This then implies that due to the traces of thermite in the wreckage, someone had to place the explosive materials on the steel columns. Then if you ask yourself this question how could a member of the Al Qaeda sneak into all three of these buildings (some of the most important buildings in the US which had high levels of security) and successfully place the explosive material on the buildings main support columns. This then leads back to the idea that 9/11 can be more than possibly an inside job.
There were many individuals that questioned the final report which was released by the US Government, two of which were Kevin Ryan and William Rodríguez.
Kevin Ryan was a former employee of Underwriters Laboratories, who was involved in conducting many of the test's surrounding the collapse of the WTC buildings. When he saw the results the government listed in the final report, he went public and questioned the final report. Within weeks of him going public he was fired.
William Rodríguez was a former janitor at the WTC, who received medals from President Bush due to the bravery he showed, when saving many lives as he unlocked many doors with the master key he had and assisting firefighters around the building.
Rodríguez testified that seconds before the first plane hit the North Tower their was a explosion below them which pushed him upwards. He told this to many federal agents behind closed doors, when the final report came out their was no mention of Rodríguez's testimony and his name. Why would a person with Rodríguez's bravery status and his heroic efforts not be recalled in the final report ?
Kevin Ryan was a former employee of Underwriters Laboratories, who was involved in conducting many of the test's surrounding the collapse of the WTC buildings. When he saw the results the government listed in the final report, he went public and questioned the final report. Within weeks of him going public he was fired.
William Rodríguez was a former janitor at the WTC, who received medals from President Bush due to the bravery he showed, when saving many lives as he unlocked many doors with the master key he had and assisting firefighters around the building.
Rodríguez testified that seconds before the first plane hit the North Tower their was a explosion below them which pushed him upwards. He told this to many federal agents behind closed doors, when the final report came out their was no mention of Rodríguez's testimony and his name. Why would a person with Rodríguez's bravery status and his heroic efforts not be recalled in the final report ?